The European Commission has devised a plan seeking to alleviate the lack of affordable housing, the continent’s worst social headache. Prices have surged: house values are up more than 60 per cent since 2015; rents more than 20 per cent.

Housing figures, the European Commission warned, stifle labour mobility, delay family formation and sap economic growth. On December 16th, the EU executive arm published the European Affordable Housing Plan, its first attempt to steer the cost of shelter down across the bloc.

The plan bundles familiar tools—money, rules, cajoling—into a single dossier. It promises to mobilise €43bn already parked in EU programmes for social, student and homeless housing. A fresh pan-European investment platform, to be built with the European Investment Bank and national promotional banks, will funnel extra cash. State-aid guidelines will soften so governments can subsidise affordable and social housing without tripping competition law. A legislative proposal on short-term rentals will help cities where such lets squeeze the market.

Officials also launched a European Strategy for Housing Construction, meant to make building cheaper and faster. A New European Bauhaus Academy will retrain carpenters and architects in green, circular methods; a Council recommendation tells town halls to slash planning red tape. The Commission promises a progress report before its mandate ends and an EU Housing Summit in 2026.

You might be interested

Call for ambition

The Parliament reacted within hours. MEP Nora Mebarek (S&D/FRA) opened the debate starkly: “The housing crisis is not just about figures, it’s lives ruined by the lack of a roof over the head.” She doubted Brussels’ arithmetic. Mobilising “seven billion here, ten billion there” would not bridge what she called a trillion-euro construction gap by 2034.

MEP Afroditi Latinopoulou (PfE/GRE) saw different culprits. “Profit has been criminalised,” she said, blaming high taxes, subsidies that “drive up rents” and the “mania with green energy” for rising costs. She also accused the EU of importing extra demand through migration.

Her fellow Greek MEP Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR), linked homes to growth: “Housing is a connective link between society and economy. Without adequate housing, we cannot have stability.” He urged help for young couples who flee inner-city “no-go zones” and struggle to start families on €850 a month.

Splits on solutions

Some deputies welcomed the blueprint but wanted more bite. MEP Marie Toussaint (Greens-EFA/FRA) called the plan “very welcome” yet warned that speculation and short-term rentals still fuel shortages. “We need to mobilise housing lying empty,” she said, and insisted that families deserve “a message of hope”.

MEP Ilaria Salis (The Left/ITA) argued that Italy’s high rents stem from past political choices. She proposed progressive taxes on rental income and a large stock of public housing, adding that “we haven’t heard it from the Commission.”

Housing is a connective link between society and economy. Without adequate housing, we cannot have stability. — MEP Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR/GRE)

Others stressed subsidiarity. Some reminded colleagues that housing remains a national competence. Brussels should encourage, recommend and incite, rather than harmonise. Still, they welcomed Commission moves to simplify permits and loosen state-aid caps, so long as member states keep control.

Cash, permits and politics

MEP Marco Falcone (EPP/ITA) praised the “new strategy on housing” but fretted over finance. Simplification matters, he said, yet resources need to be “clear and specific”. When a fellow deputy queried his “build, build, build” mantra, Mr Falcone replied that Europe must both construct and regenerate existing stock “to avoid rural depopulation”.

Yet many agreed that permits slow everything, saying that planning delays choke not only new houses but also water, roads and power links. Others urged the Commission to benchmark approval times across the bloc. Several members echoed the plea for faster paperwork and for state-aid tweaks that let municipalities underwrite brownfield clean-ups.

Short-term rentals drew mixed views. Some deputies wanted strict caps, others feared hurting tourism. One Irish member warned that a blanket ban at home left rural areas short of beds. The Commission’s promise of a targeted law—aimed only at “areas under housing stress”—won cautious support.

Real-life hurdles

The debate’s liveliest clash concerned migration. Right-wing MEPs said rising demand outstrips supply because Europe “keeps importing people”. Left-wing voices replied that speculation, not migrants, drives prices. The exchange exposed ideological fault-lines yet masked a broader consensus: too few homes are being built.

The plan now moves to execution. A European Housing Alliance will gather cities, builders and NGOs to share templates and data. Revised state-aid rules should land early in 2026, followed by the short-term-rental proposal. Still, cash alone cannot conjure cranes. Skilled labour is scarce, and supply-chain glitches keep materials dear.

We need to mobilise housing lying empty. Families deserve a message of hope. —  MEP Marie Toussaint (Greens-EFA/FRA)

The Commission bets on its New European Bauhaus Academy to retrain workers in sustainable methods. Some deputies applauded the idea; others worried that green standards inflate costs. Brussels insists the academy will lower bills by spreading efficient design. Skeptics urge a “moratorium on standards” until inflation cools.

Little steps, big hopes

Politically, housing is becoming a litmus test. Rising rents harden generational divides and erode faith in institutions. The Parliament wants proof of progress before voters return to the polls in 2029. If rents keep soaring, pressure for tougher EU action—a social-housing fund, perhaps, or stricter curbs on speculation—will grow.

For now the plan is heavy on coordination and light on direct grants. Yet even its critics admit that Brussels has shifted the debate. Housing once lurked on the margins of EU policy; it now commands a Commissioner, a budget line and a summit. One Socialist summed up the mood: the plan “will stabilise prices and bring more balance to a market captured by the greed of a few”.

Whether that comes to pass hinges on town halls as much as Brussels. Planning reforms, state-aid applications and local land policies decide how soon cranes rise. The Commission can grease the process; it cannot pour concrete. Anyways, after years of silence, the Union has chosen to speak—and, its officials promise, to spend—on Europe’s most personal crisis.