EU is rewriting the rules at an unsual pace. From cutting red tape for small businesses, giving farmers quicker payouts, to leaving consumers in the dark about how green their products really are, ten Omnibus packages are reshaping everyday life across Europe. Here’s what’s changing, who stands to gain, and where the biggest risks lie.
Omnibus I – Sustainability
The flagship package, adopted February 2026, quietly let most companies off the hook for sustainability reporting. Fewer businesses will have to disclose their environmental and human rights records. That means consumers—or investors—will have less information about the products these companies sell.
Key changes include raising the employee threshold for corporate reporting under Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), simplifying the rules of Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), easing EU Taxonomy reporting, and streamlining the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).
A clothing brand was, for example, required to check that none of its suppliers employs children or pollutes the environment by discharging chemicals into rivers. If the company has fewer than 1,000 employees it will no longer have the obligation to report on such issues.
Critics view it as a step back from the EU’s green ambitions and a signal that human rights are being pushed down the list of priorities. “Massively reducing the scope of application of legislation is substantial backtracking. It is basically a renunciation of previous sustainability targets,” Judith Arnal, an associate Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for European Policy Studies and Senior Research Fellow at the Elcano Royal Institute, said to EU Perspectives.
You might be interested
Omnibus II – Investment
Adopted alongside Omnibus I in February 2025, this package freed up old investment funds to be recycled into new projects. It aims to unlock €50 billion in fresh public and private investment. The package simplified the InvestEU programme and legacy European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) instruments. This makes it easier to redeploy returns from previous projects and channel member state support to businesses.
This is particularly significant for smaller or startup businesses, which often rely on external support. A small manufacturer of eco-friendly building materials, for instance, may want to expand production and invest in a second production line. Previously, they would have had to wait months for the complex approval process. At the same time, there was a risk that some funds from past projects remained unused.
Omnibus II is designed to speed up this process. “We are cutting red tape for companies applying for the funds and for the implementing partners. All in all, this is a good day for European competitiveness,” Morten Bødskov, Denmark’s Minister for Industry, said.
Critical voices, however, question whether this will actually attract new investment or merely shift existing resources. Some analysts warn that repurposing existing funds risks bypassing democratic oversight and weakening control over how public money is used.
Omnibus III – Agriculture
Facing farmer protests across Europe, Brussels doubled small farm payments and slashed red tape —delivering one of the fastest legislative turnarounds in recent EU history.
Presented in May 2025, this package simplified the 2021–2027 Common Agricultural Policy framework. It reduces inspection burdens and eases Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions (GAEC) environmental conditions for organic farms. It also doubled the lump-sum payment cap for small farmers from €1,250 to €2,500.
A small local farmer may now face fewer inspections and less paperwork when applying for EU subsidies. Instead of navigating complex compliance rules, they can focus more on production while receiving bigger support. Critics warn it could weaken environmental safeguards and potentially lower common quality standards.
It was adopted quickly by both co-legislators and entered into force on 1 January 2026. The projected savings amount to €1.58 billion for farmers and €210 million for national administrations.
Omnibus IV – Single market
Brussels extended a raft of regulatory exemptions previously reserved for small businesses to a wider group of mid-sized companies. The package cuts paperwork requirements on data protection, climate rules, and supply chains. It also gives firms more time to comply with battery sourcing laws.
“The single market is our best asset to respond to external pressures (…) but important obstacles persist, particularly at national level,” said Commissioner Stéphane Séjourné, who oversees industry policy.
Presented in May 2025, this package targeted small and medium enterprise (SMEs) and small mid-caps by extending SME-style regulatory treatment to a broader category of smaller companies across several EU legal instruments.
Key measures included easing General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) record-keeping obligations for smaller firms. They also simplified access to EU trade defence tools and streamlined F-gas rules and postponed battery supply chain due diligence requirements by two years to August 2027.
A tech startup providing cloud services to individual customers may no longer need to maintain full GDPR records immediately. That means users’ personal data could be less rigorously tracked and protected. Critics warn that it could compromise customer privacy in order to reduce administrative burdens.
Omnibus V – Defence
As Europe scrambles to rearm, Brussels simplifies defence procurement. The package cuts permit timelines from years to 60 days and opens EU defence funding to Ukrainian firms for the first time.
“Our single market is a powerful tool to accelerate European defence industrial production to deter potential threats to the EU countries and our citizens,” said Valdis Dombrovskis, Commissioner for Economy and Productivity, Implementation and Simplification.
Adopted in June 2025, this package aimed to boost Europe’s defence investment under the ReArm Europe plan and the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030. It introduced 60-day fast-track permitting and raised procurement thresholds to speed up cross-border acquisitions. It also streamlined the European Defence Fund, including greater participation for Ukrainian entities. A ‘Mini Defence Omnibus’ entered into force in December 2025 to immediately extend financial programme eligibility to defence-related products.
Omnibus VI – Chemicals
The EU gave the chemical industry a regulatory breather. Key measures included postponing classification, labelling and packaging rules to 2028 and simplifying requirements for chemical product registration. Adopted in July 2025, this package cut compliance costs and administrative procedures across the chemical value chain while proclaiming it maintains strong public health and environmental protections.
A household cleaning products companies would previously have been required to update hazard labels more quickly to reflect new chemical classifications. Under the new rules, these labelling requirements are postponed until 2028, allowing continued sales without immediate relabelling. The Commission insists the changes stop short of weakening health standards, but consumer groups warn otherwise.
Omnibus VII – Digital
Presented in November 2025, this is the most politically contentious package. It comprises two proposed regulations: one simplifying the AI Act’s implementation, and one consolidating rules across GDPR, NIS2, DORA, the Data Act, and the CER Directive.
“Simplification is essential to cut red tape and strengthen EU competitiveness — but not at the expense of fundamental rights,” said European Data Protection Board Supervisor Chair, Anu Talus.
It proposes a single incident-reporting point across multiple EU digital laws, facilitates use of personal data in AI training, and extends transitional periods for high-risk AI provisions. The Council agreed its position on the AI component in March 2026. Trilogue is ongoing with a target of finalisation before the AI Act’s full application date of August 2026.
Omnibus VIII – Environment
Brussels streamlined environmental permitting and cut oversight procedures for factories and industrial sites. The Commission calls these moves simplification, critics warn it will weaken the checks designed to protect people from industrial pollution.
“Now the omnibus offers to take it a step further, bringing regulatory uncertainty for companies and putting local communities at risk,” said Van Elsen to Euronews, senior industrial policy coordinator at the green NGO Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe.
Six legislative proposals adopted in December 2025 targeting simplification of industrial emissions rules, circular economy legislation, environmental impact assessment procedures, and geospatial data requirements. The package focuses on speeding up permitting for environmental assessments and reducing procedural duplication for businesses operating across multiple environmental regulatory regimes.
Omnibus IX – Automotive
Brussels cut the bureaucracy around vehicle testing and certification to help carmakers without touching the emissions targets that tell them what to build.
Adopted in December 2025, this package aims to ease administrative burdens on EU manufacturers navigating the transition to clean mobility. A carmaker launching a new electric model may now face fewer steps when getting it approved for the EU market. It does not revisit CO₂ fleet targets but reduces the compliance architecture around type approval, certification, and reporting.
Omnibus X – Food, feed & health
Brussels trimmed the paperwork burden across the EU’s food safety rulebook—from pesticides to animal feed—banking on digitalisation to do what decades of overlapping regulations could not. “The leaked working version published in the press paves the way for a significant weakening of the EU’s health and environmental protections in the field of pesticides,” wrote the Veblen Institute.
The final package of 2025, adopted in December, introduced cross-cutting simplifications across plant protection products, biocidal products, animal feed, official controls, and animal health and welfare legislation.
For example, a manufacturer or farmer may be able to continue using an already approved pesticide or existing stock for several more years without immediately meeting new administrative requirements or waiting for a prompt renewal of its authorisation.
Ten packages one goal
The ten packages share a common logic. Regulations built up over two decades of the Green Deal era under the Commission lead by Ursula von der Leyen are now being trimmed, delayed, or narrowed in scope. Supporters argue the burden had become a drag on European competitiveness. Critics call it a dismantling by stealth. What is not in dispute is the pace — several packages were adopted in months. That’s a timeline that would have been unthinkable for any single piece of landmark legislation.
