The EU’s oldest common policy is under pressure. Agriculture ministers meeting in Luxembourg this week demanded more national flexibility in the Common Agricultural Policy due to run from 2028, raising questions about whether farm support can remain truly common across all 27 member states.

The debate took centre stage at the Agriculture and Fisheries Council on 23 June, chaired by Maria Panayiotou, Cyprus’s minister for agriculture. Ministers welcomed amendments proposed by the Presidency but pushed for greater subsidiarity and simplification, arguing that farmers and national authorities need enough room to put the CAP’s goals into practice.

The question at the heart of the debate is straightforward: how much room should member states have to adapt EU farm rules to their own conditions without undermining the policy’s common character? The Commission’s proposal for the 2028–2034 period already offers more flexibility than the current CAP. Ministers want more still.

Common policy, national rules

The debate comes as European agriculture faces mounting pressure. Market volatility, climate risks, squeezed farm incomes and growing concerns about food security are all piling up at once.

Ministers made clear that flexibility will be one of the main political demands in the CAP negotiations. They called for more room in designing income support and environmental schemes. But they also insisted that a level playing field across the EU must be preserved.

You might be interested

The issue is politically sensitive. The CAP is one of the EU’s core common policies, but too little flexibility risks imposing unsuitable rules on very different national farming systems. Too much, however, could weaken its common character and lead to unequal treatment of farmers across the bloc.

Simplification pressure grows

Ministers called for simpler rules to reduce the administrative burden on farmers and public authorities. The demand reflects longstanding complaints about CAP complexity. Simplification, they argued, is essential at a time when farmers already face economic uncertainty and tightening climate requirements.

Supporting our farmers is not only about food production.
— Maria Panayiotou, Minister for Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment, Cyprus

Ms Panayiotou said the Presidency’s work had been guided by the motto “An Autonomous Europe, Open to the World”, placing agriculture “firmly at the centre of Europe’s strategic priorities”. “Supporting our farmers is not only about food production,” she said. “It is about safeguarding food security, sustaining vibrant rural communities, and ensuring Europe’s resilience, competitiveness and autonomy in an increasingly uncertain world.”

The price of flexibility

The discussion showed that member states broadly support the direction of work but want more control over how the next CAP is applied on the ground. The challenge for the EU is clear. It must design a post-2027 system that grants flexibility to member states. But common rules, environmental ambition and equal treatment of farmers across the Union must stay intact.

That balance will shape the next phase of negotiations. The EU must now design a farm policy for 2028 that works for 27 very different agricultural systems, without losing what makes it common.